Does Gold Mining Matter?
Mises Daily: Friday, August 14, 2009 by Robert Blumen
ArticleCommentsAlso by
Robert Blumen
What Determines the Price
of Gold?
The outlooks of gold
analysts are diverse. After reading the latest WGC report, Mineweb is
bullish: "Gold demand tops US$100 billion and mine supply
remains under threat." John Nadler, however, is
bearish, citing the expected "additional 400–500 tonnes per
annum" that will result from the exploration boom of the last few years. Tom
Barlow even
asks, "Are we running out of gold?"
I choose these examples
not to pick on these authors. I could have just as easily chosen a hundred
other examples: the vast majority of analysts who cover the gold market focus
on mine supply as one of the main drivers of gold-price forecasts. I use these
examples only to illustrate the ubiquity of this view.[1] However,
while analysts need something to analyze — and the mining industry provides
many analytical complexities — ultimately, their efforts are wasted. Mine
supply has very little influence on the price of gold.
Anyone who agrees that
the gold trade is a market would accept the premise that the price depends on
supply and demand. Where most analysts go wrong is to analyze gold using what I
will call the consumption model. This model counts the
current year's mine production plus scrap (and, in some versions, central-bank
sales) as supply, and the current year's purchases of jewelry, coins, bars, and
industrial gold as demand.
Gold and the Consumption
Model
The consumption model is good way to forecast the price of a commodity that meets two
conditions:
1.
it is destructively consumed (or spoils), and
2.
the annual production of the commodity is large in relation to
existing, above-ground stockpiles.
Oil is a good example of
a commodity that meets these conditions. It is refined and then irreversibly
combusted. The oil price must enable
the market to clear more-or-less current production with current consumption,
buffered only by the oil sitting on tankers and in underground reserves.
Reserves cannot do not hold more than a few months' supply, due to the high
rate of oil consumption in relation to the storage capacity.
The consumption model does not explain price formation of a
commodity where the two conditions are not met, because owners of the existing
stocks own much more of the commodity than the producers bring to market. Consequently,
they have far more influence over the price than do producers. Gold is the best
example of such a commodity: gold is not consumed; people buy it in order to
hold it; gold has the largest ratio of stock to annual production of any
commodity.
In fact, it is estimated
that nearly all of the gold ever mined in human history still exists. This
supply grows by only 1 to 2 percent on an annual basis; or, if we look at the
ratio from the other side, approximately 50–100 times the annual mine
production is held in stockpiles.[2]
The consumption model
would hold true if each year's gold were segregated into its own market, with
no arbitrage from previous years' markets. But this is not the case: everyone
who is buying, selling, and holding forms a single, integrated market. A buyer
doesn't care whether he receives gold mined within the past year.[3] Gold
miners are competing with all of the holders of gold stockpiles when they sell.
Contrary to the consumption model, the price of gold does clear the supply of
recently mined gold against coin buyers; it clears all buyers against all
sellers and holders. The amount of gold available at any price depends largely
on the preferences of existing gold owners, because they own most of the gold.
Looking at the supply side of the market, each ounce in
someone's stockpile is for sale at some price. The offered price of each ounce
is distinct from that of each other ounce, because each gold owner has a
minimum selling price, or "reservation price," for each one of their
ounces. The demand for gold comes from holders of fiat money who demand gold by
offering some quantity of money for it. In the same way that every ounce of
gold is for sale at some price, every dollar would be sold if a sufficient
volume of goods were offered in exchange. While some dollar owners are not
interested in owning gold at any price, those who are interested have a maximum
buying price for each ounce that they might purchase. You can think of their
buying prices for gold ounces as their reservation price for holding dollars.
How the Price of Gold Is
Formed
Rothbard provides a detailed, bottom-up analysis of price formation in a market
like this. I will demonstrate his model with a sequence of diagrams that show
how the dollar price of gold is formed. As a first step, suppose that while
gold trading had been suspended for some time, the preferences of some of the
gold owners and nonowners changed. Thus, when the market opens, some of them
wish to buy while others wish to sell.
Rothbard constructs supply and demand curves using the
reservation prices of the individual buyers and sellers. The supply curve at
each price is the total amount of gold ounces for sale by all gold owners at or
above that price. The demand curve at each price is the total amount gold
ounces that could be purchased with the dollars offered at that price (or below
that price). The market-clearing price is that point where supply and demand
are balanced.
When trading opened, the market participants would converge on
market-clearing price. Once a price had been established, all of the buyers
offering at or above that price would buy, and the all of the sellers asking at
or below that price would sell. Trading would continue until no one wanted to
exchange gold for dollars or dollars for gold. At that point in time, the
market will have cleared.
After trading, everyone
has adjusted gold and dollar balances to their preferred levels. The market
would show two quoted prices for gold: the best bid and the best offer. The best bid is the price offered by the marginal nonbuyer of gold, and the best offer is the price asked by the marginal nonseller of gold. More
trading could occur only if a buyer increased their bid price, or a seller
decreased their ask price, for at least one ounce.
Suppose that, from this
new starting point, one gold owner lowered his asking price for one of his
ounces below the best offer of the most marginal seller. A trade would then
take place between the gold owner and the marginal seller. What would the
situation be after the trade? The same as before, except that the best bid and
best offer prices mightbe different. The new prices would depend on the reservation
price of the buyer of the single ounce. If his reservation price were above the
best bid but below that of the next most marginal seller, then the new buyer
wouldbecome the marginal seller and would set the best offer price. But his
reservation price might be much higher — enough to make another one of the
existing gold owners the new marginal seller.
The miner is different
from other gold owners in that he produces gold, while the other owners bought
their gold. But from a price-formation standpoint, it doesn't matter how or
where it came from; the miner can choose a reservation price, or not. Most
miners do not have a reservation price; they sell at
market.[4]
The gold analysts and I
agree that, in a market, the marginal buyer and seller set the prices. It is
also true that the miner is always a marginal seller because they sell at
market. However, the entire population of
suppliers and demanders must be considered in order to identify who the
marginal buyers are and the price where the trades take place. All of the
demanders influence the price through their decision not to offer a higher
price. All of the (nonmine) suppliers influence the price through their
decision not to ask for a lower price. To sell at market means to sell at the price set largely by those buyers and sellers who do have
reservation prices. The problem with the consumption model is that it ignores the
influence of the majority of sellers on the price.
How does the presence of
sellers selling at market affect
the price?
Once the miner has sold
his stocks, we are back to the situation shown in Figure 2. What was the
freshly mined gold is part of the new buyer's stockpile. There will be a new
bid and ask price, which will take into account the reservation price of the
person who bought the miner's gold. We cannot say whatthe new
bid and ask will be: either could be above or below the price before the miner
sold.
Some Objections
Now that I've explained how the price of gold is determined in
the market, I will look at two of the objections I have received when I have
presented the ideas above:
Mine supply is the only supply available to the market, because
gold investors are primarily of the buy-and-hold mindset.
If gold buyers typically have long holding periods, then is gold
like oil that was burned or corn that was eaten? Is it gone forever and not
part of the market?
Every asset is for sale at some price. While many small gold
coin and bar buyers have a reservation price that is more than $10 above
today's price, they do have a reservation price. There is a point at which
other assets (stocks or bonds) or consumption goods (cars or houses) would
start to look more attractive than holding the marginal ounce of gold. There
can be no doubt that a good many gold owners would become sellers at $5,000,
$10,000, or $100,000 per ounce.
Existing stocks of gold don't affect the price because they are
not for sale at the current price.
On closer examination,
this is not really an argument: it is only a restatement of the definition ofprice. A price in a
cleared market is that quantity of money below which nothing is offered for
sale. While this is true, it does not provide any information about what the price will be. As discussed above, the price at which the
first mined ounce is sold is set by the marginal nonseller and nonbuyers of
gold.
Suppose, for example, that all of the gold owners had a
reservation price of $5,000 or higher per ounce, with the buy prices of people
holding dollars remaining where they are now. If that were the case, then once
miners had sold their gold, gold would be offered at around $5,000 per ounce.
Conclusion
While mining doesn't have much impact on the gold price, the
reverse is not true: the gold price has significant influence on the mining
industry. The economics of mining explains this. The cost of getting the gold
out of the ground is sensitive to several factors, including the grade of the
deposit, its depth below the surface, proximity to refining infrastructure, the
cost of energy, the cost of labor, and other variables. The marginal cost of
mining more gold above current production rises rather sharply. It would not be
profitable for the gold-mining industry to increase production enough to have
much impact on the total gold supply during any given year.
The consumption model of
gold pricing ignores the influence of the majority of sellers on the price of
gold. It counts only a minority of the sellers. The consumption model does
include "scrap sales" (sales by those sellers whose reservation price
was low enough to result in a sale). But the suppliers who did not sell outnumber those who did — by a large margin — and the selling
price of those who did sell was primarily determined by those who did not.
Robert Blumen is an
independent enterprise software consultant based in San Francisco. Send him mail. See hisarticle archives.
Comment on the blog.
You can subscribe to
future articles by this author via this RSS
feed.
Notes
[1] The
sole exception that I can think of is a report from Credit Agricole, authored by Paul Mylchreest.
[2] You
must register with the World Gold Council to download their
supply and demand data. For a comprehensive set of statistics,
including the total above-ground stockpiles, see Gold Market Knowledge.
[3] The
time window of one year is entirely arbitrary — why not one week?
[4] Some
miners sell at a predetermined price because they have entered into hedging
contracts. This price could be above or below the market. Other
miners (though very few) do have a reservation price. These miners stockpile
gold if it is above their reservation price.